21, November, 2013
Mafias and criminal gangs often demand of their young, would-be adherents commit an act of theft, violence or even murder. Mafias represent the opposite to civilized society because they rule by violence and by a central violent leadership.
So what should we expect from the European Union whose foreign policy is supposed to encourage human rights and the rule of law? It should denounce murders. It should expose any operation that glorifies murder as an entrance ticket to Mafia power. Instead the EU is acting exactly in opposite way. It is acting as the scared victim of violence that cannot or will not speak out against injustice and crime.
After vicious arm-twisting by the US Obama administration, the Israelis recently released 26 murderers. Why did the Nobel Peace Laureate Barack Hussein Obama want a democracy to distort and interfere with the judgements its Courts of Justice? Because the Arab Palestinians refused to talk peace with the Israelis and set pre-conditions. To anyone with a couple of brain cells, that should signal a corrupt peace-process. Why should genuine peace-seekers set pre-conditions? What sort of pre-condition is ‘Get my gang of convicted murderers out of prison first!’?
Did the European Union denounce this travesty to disrupt court-based justice? Not at all! Would any European State or its politicians release convicted murderers in similar circumstances?
What do normal civilized European States do when murderers are released from jail? Two things. They try to rehabilitate them but make sure that the population in general is protected from further crime and violence.
What does a Mafia do? It promotes them. What does the Arab Palestinian Authority do when 26 convicted murderers are released? What would YOU do if you had to decide on what to do with
- murderers who dressed as women to kill the female driver who took Arabs to work,
- murderers who threw grenades, set off bombs and helped organize other deaths
- a murderer of a man caring for flowers in his greenhouse,
- murderers who stabbed passengers on buses,
- murderers who kidnapped and killed hikers
- murderers who attacked a car and killed its passengers when it entered their village,
- an axe-murderer who killed a 79-year old man reading a book in a park
- murderers who stabbed an orchard-owner with a knife and a pair of pruning shears,
- a murderer who killed a French woman tourist in a restaurant where he worked,
- a member of a gang implicated in the terrorist murder at the holy site of Machpellah cave, the burial place of Abraham, Sarah and Jacob, the patriarch of the twelve tribes of Israel. ????
So what did the Arab Palestinian Administration do? The unelected president of the PA called the released murderers ‘HEROES’!! He celebrated with fireworks. Then he took action.
He divided up the the murderers into two groups. The more vicious killers had been given sentences of more than 25 years by the Courts. Abbas gave all of them 50,000 dollars. That’s not all. They were given high paying jobs. They had the choice of becoming Deputy Minister in one of the many Palestinian ministries. Or if they were especially vicious killers they were given the rank of major general in the army also with a fat salary. Those Palestinian terrorists who were sentenced to 15 to 25 years were given the position of Deputy Director at the ministries or a military rank of brigadier general.
‘The prisoners are part of our fighters and therefore deserve money,’ said the Palestinian Authority. Ahem. Whose money would that be?
How does the European Union recruit its Directors general? Do they look for people who were convicted of murder? Is that the critical condition?
Clearly the PLO want the convicted murderers — now generals or policy-makers — to train other young people to murder other innocent citizens. Isn’t this terror game clear to everyone? On recent figures the PA has 170,000 officials and pensioners — three times the number of all EU’s officials!
When asked repeatedly, the Commission refused to give any comment at all on this outrage. Why is the EU acting like a scared dog?
The answer is oil. The EU will grind to a halt if the Arabs and OPEC Cartel cut off petroleum supplies. They already did this in the 1970s when an oil embargo was placed on all its nations with total embargo on the Netherlands and Denmark. The oil-exporters applied the Oil Weapon to get Europe to change its foreign policy towards Israel. Blackmail. The exorbitant profits between the minimal cost of collecting from oil wells, now compounded over forty years amounts to a Money Weapon. It is the source of great global instability. The first and second Oil Shocks increased oil prices by 400 percent. Around 2000 in the Third Oil Shock prices were forced up by 1600 percent from $9 (just above its free market price) to $147!
The only way Europe can free itself is to become independent in its energy production. Part of the illegal, closed-door deal was that Europe would financially support the so-called Palestinians who mysteriously sprang into existence in 1964. The EU has spent billions on the ‘Palestinians’ without result whether under Hamas or Fatah. Three out of four ‘Palestinians’ say the whole administration is corrupt. It doesn’t take a genius to work that out. Apparently the EU — the wealthiest grouping in the world with 500 million brainy citizens — has no one up to the job.
A report to be published soon says that the ‘Palestinians’ have squandered some TWO BILLION of EU aid — lost without proper trace. Why should the hard-pressed European taxpayer put up with it?
So scared is the EU that it only denounces Israel, the only democracy in the Middle East. Its EU foreign policy chief denounces the building of garages, kindergarten and homes in Israel’s capital Jerusalem. Some 1100 international jurists and professors of law from around the world have written to the EU saying that Israel has every right according to international law to build there and in Judea and Samaria. Instead the misnamed European External Action Service takes a politically prejudiced view that politics trumps international law.
David Heilbron Price