President Trump told UK Prime Minister Theresa May that the UK should sue the European Union rather than exit it. Mrs May said this was a too “brutal” solution. Why? It would disrupt Westminister as well as Brussels.

Sue the European Union for what?

One obvious case would be to attack in law the Spitzenkandidat system — that elected Jean-Claude Juncker. It makes it impossible for a Briton to ever be elected to his post of President of the European Commission. It is directly in opposition not only to human rights and elementary democracy but the treaties the politicians wrote themselves. There are several other such issues of injustice and fraud.
Why go to Court? To get Justice. To expose facts to public view. To let not only the judges judge, but the people too.

What other cases should be introduced to Europe’s highest courts? That is explained fully in my eBook “Don’t Brexit, Fix it!” Five copies of the full paper version under the title “Brexit and Britain’s Vision for Europe” were sent to Mrs May and Brexit ministers at 10 Downing Street in late summer 2016, just after the Referendum.

What is the case against the EU? Corruption arising from its democratic deficit. I have described at length how Robert Schuman, the initiator of Europe’s Democracy, defined the mechanism of true democracy and justice. All sectors of society involved must have their say. No political decision can be made by faceless bureaucrats. No decision can be made in secret.

CORRUPTION! And far more than party political corruption.

Someone once wrote:
“My ideal political world would be the ABSENCE of political “parties,” because having a two-party political system has resulted in corruption on both sides of the aisle. ”
How does it affect our systems on both sides of the Atlantic? For that we need to go back to the origin of corruption in the party political system.
That involves the “completely unscrupulous and political ingenious” scheme presented to King William of Orange after the “Glorious Revolution” in England. It dates from 1695 and was the brainchild of Robert Spencer, Earl of Sunderland.
William had arrived from Holland to secure the Protestant religion and expected to save the country from the French and Catholic invasions. He was finding it impossible to govern because the “damnable British Parliament is elected to govern England and only wants what all Englishmen want: not to be governed at all.”
Spencer (a forbear of Lady Di) suggested that he follow this “devilishly subtle” plan. Instead of choosing his ministers on their merits and capacities without regard to parties, a Whig here and a Tory there, King William III should chose his ministers from the same party. William expostulated that this was a mad idea. The majority was then Whig and hardly sympathetic to strong centralism.
Spencer explained about the subtle governance potential of alternance of government. “If his Majesty adopts this plan, no member of the House of Commons will ever vote again according to his principles or his convictions or his judgment or his religion or any other of his fancies.” The people will think he is voting for them but the real question will be whether or not his party will remain in office or how much it would cost him in a further election with the risk of losing his seat.
And, said Spencer, the parties will be so much involved in fighting each other that there will never be another Cromwell or a Revolution. His royal power would be secure.
Quotes above are taken from George Bernard Shaw’s “Everybody’s Political What’s What” chap 3.

In the US system we can replace the concept of “King” not by President but by the Shadow Government and what in the 1950s President Eisenhower originally called the “Military Industrial Congressional Complex“.
I highly recommend for those interested to sit down with a cup of tea or coffee for an hour or so for the incisive analysis of the Kevin M Shipp, ex-CIA insider. This presentation was at a Tea Party meeting recently. It summarises a huge amount of facts and research on the misuse of secret powers up to this day.

It starts at 15 minutes after prayers and pledge to the flag.

Author :


  1. Many believed that the president had advised May to abandon the negotiations, even after he denied it, but the proposal that the UK should take legal measures against the EU even goes beyond the expectations of Brexit supporters.

    On Friday, during a press conference, Trump told reporters that he had made an “offer” to the British leader about what she could do in the Brexit talks, but declined to say what kind of advice it was, adding only that May recognized him too “cruel “.

    Answering the question of what kind of presidential advice was on the BBC television show, the prime minister noted that “he said that I should sue the EU – sue the EU – not to enter into negotiations, but with them.”

    The president of the United States, Donald Trump, said that the “soft” exit plan from the European Union (Brexit), adopted by the government of Theresa May, could prevent the conclusion of a trade agreement between the United Kingdom and the United States.

  2. Pingback: Google
  3. Pingback: comprar likes
  4. Pingback: Part time jobs
  5. Pingback: Sonia Randhawa
  6. Pingback: kratom near me
  7. Pingback: cbd for cats
  8. Pingback: Sonia Randhawa
  9. Pingback: Sonia Randhawa
  10. Pingback: Sonia Randhawa
  11. Pingback: Extreme incense
  12. Pingback: consultant seo
  13. Pingback: buy CBD
  14. Pingback: عزة
  15. Pingback: حلوه
  16. Pingback: Amsterdam escorts
  17. Pingback: Kratom near me
  18. Pingback: RoyalCBD
  19. Pingback: knowledge
  20. Pingback: cbd vs thc
  21. Pingback: RoyalCBD
  22. Pingback: Royal CBD
  23. Pingback: RoyalCBD
  24. Pingback: Royal CBD
  25. Pingback: wyoming cbd
  26. Pingback: RoyalCBD
  27. Pingback: wisconsin
  28. Pingback:
  29. Pingback: Royal CBD
  30. Pingback: cbd oil oklahoma
  31. Pingback: cbd oil utah
  32. Pingback: RoyalCBD
  33. Pingback: tennessee
  34. Pingback: texas
  35. Pingback: RoyalCBD
  36. Pingback: ohio
  37. Pingback:
  38. Pingback: RoyalCBD
  39. Pingback: cbd new mexico
  40. Pingback: RoyalCBD
  41. Pingback: nevada
  42. Pingback: montana cbd
  43. Pingback: missouri
  44. Pingback: minnesota
  45. Pingback: maryland cbd
  46. Pingback: RoyalCBD
  47. Pingback: RoyalCBD
  48. Pingback: RoyalCBD
  49. Pingback: illinois cbd
  50. Pingback: iowa cbd
  51. Pingback: connecticut
  52. Pingback: cbd delaware
  53. Pingback: arkansas
  54. Pingback: arizona
  55. Pingback:
  56. Pingback: cbd oil california
  57. Pingback: alabama cbd

Leave a Reply