PM May and Parliament gets Petition on its “Great Brexit Fraud”!
10, February, 2019
In other words the Lisbon treaty makes a major dislocation to British democracy and the UK constitution. It creates powers ABOVE the nation State — directly contrary to the founding principles of the Community system. Robert Schuman was clear: the nation State was the final arbiter of the powers delegated in a Community. The people must be free to choose.
So let us just admit the Fraud. Cheat the people and they vote against you. So let us then logically analyse how Brexit became inevitable. That is the first step to repair confidence.
- How does the country escape financial ruin if all euro-based trading leaves UK and the City?
- Legal collapse (No replacement agencies are in place, nor treaties)?
- Industrial pauperisation?
- How can a country look into the future with every British and European regulation legally unsafe?
So what can be done about it?
- Why on earth would an honest government try to hide the fact that the treaty was soundly rejected in French and Dutch referendums?
- That Governments promised one in the UK?
- That Britons are still waiting for that?
- Then to add insult to illegality the government is wrong in using an article in a treaty that first requires a referendum to activate it?
They should be aware of the consequences for parliamentary democracy and long-term lack of trust in UK institutions.
Dear Sir or Madam,{My petition is entitled } “Parliament and HMG must retract Article 50 Letter. Legal basis in treaty is flawed”.I was surprised to be informed yesterday that my petition had been rejected by the petitions committee.It was stated that “It’s not clear what the petition is asking the UK Government or Parliament to do. Petitions need to call on the Government or Parliament to take a specific action. We’re not sure exactly what you’d like the Government or Parliament to do. The Lisbon Treaty came into force in 2009.”I believe I was eminently clear about what the government and Parliament should do. I enumerated the following two points as
“Action required by Parliament and Government..1. Withdraw or suspend Article 50 Letter2. Hold a referendum on the Lisbon Treaty to validate so it can be used for its Article 50.”I also wrote to the Prime Minister Theresa May in 2016, four Secretaries of State concerned (Trade, Foreign Office, Cabinet Office and Brexit) and a number of MPs on the Brexit committees explaining the issues involved. I sent a copy of my book “Brexit and Britain’s Vision for Europe” to each of them.A parliamentary discussion is urgently needed to review the legality of action that HMG and Parliament have already taken. Both major parties when in Government and Opposition said that a referendum was necessary to validate the EU Treaty. It can be concluded therefore that a referendum was considered legally indisputable to them.And then they reneged.The reasons they did not go through with this pledge and legal obligation is the crux of the debate that is now required by the public and the signatories of the petition. It also provides the solution to the Brexit dilemma.Constitutionally and legally, the Lisbon Treaty needs to be properly validated according to their own promises, commitments and “cast-iron” guarantees of action. The EU treaty has changed not only the British constitution but added new institutions and power in Brussels “massively” modifying our relationship with Europe earlier (to quote Mr Cameron).The previous European Community arrangement was subject to approval by referendum in 1975. No further change can be made from the Community system without a further referendum. This is especially the case as the Lisbon Treaty completely changes the European Community system so radically. Both EEC and Euratom had articles (approved by the public in the 1975 referendum) that the treaties were in force for an unlimited period.That means that Brexit under Article 50 of a subsequent treaty is ruled out. Permanence of the democratic link to the Continent and commitment to democratic solutions in open democratic institutions cannot be overruled by a legally unsafe treaty, consistently opposed by a majority of the population. This is especially the case as the Lisbon Treaty and its earlier reincarnation were roundly rejected by other Member States in their referendums.The petition would also provide the means to resolve the blockage in Parliament on the Withdrawal Treaty — where no majority can be found to move forward. A clarification of the UK constitutional position could provide a breathing space to consolidate UK policy. A judicial review of our democratic relations with Europe and its democracies is essential for a stable near- and long-term future. Britain’s voice is crucial for democratic reform of the European institutions to make them more open and accountable. The Democratic Deficit that has been on the political agenda for three or four decades needs to be tackled seriously.I would therefore request that you supply me with(a) the details about how this decision was made and clarifying the grounds it gave for rejection.(b) the time and place the decision was made,(c) the names of MPs who voted, with their reasoning.(d) the system for making an Appeal because a decision was not impartial.Yours etc
, Blair, Brexit, Cameron, Constitution, democracy, EEC, EU Treaty, Euratom, France, illegal, Lisbon treaty, Netherlands, Parliament, Petition, referendum, Schuman, Theresa May |
Comments
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Our website
http://virtuelcampus.univ-msila.dz/facscience
I intended to draft you a little remark so as to say thank you yet again for your magnificent things you’ve shared on this website. This has been so incredibly open-handed of you to supply freely all that many individuals would have advertised as an e-book to end up making some profit for their own end, principally given that you might well have tried it in case you considered necessary. The strategies also worked like a fantastic way to know that other people have a similar dream much like mine to see a lot more around this matter. I believe there are a lot more pleasurable moments in the future for individuals that go through your blog.
https://usawriters.org/how_we_work
Your post is great and engaging, the content is very practical, and gets people’s attention. Thank you for sharing. online jigsaw puzzles
Thanks for the information your post brings. I see the novelty in your text, I will share it for everyone to read. I look forward to reading more articles from you.
mapquest directions
Thank you, it is very helpful article
Faculté de droit
This is such a great resource that you are providing and you give it away for free. I love seeing blog that understand the value of providing a quality resource for free.
download for android
very interesting article. thank you
http://virtuelcampus.univ-msila.dz/fll
PM May and Parliament get Petition about their “Great Brexit Fraud”. MPs Reject Petition exposing the “Great Brexit Fraud” but Government gets the message.
click on here
Thank you, it is very helpful article
Faculté de droit
Thank you, it is very helpful article..
Faculté de droit
This is not good because people do not like fraud related activities and I hope, this government will take some serious actions and manage positive steps towards this issue and people will get pleasure. Buy Dissertation Online.
Interesting post. I Have Been wondering about this issue, so thanks for posting. Pretty cool post.It ‘s really very nice and Useful post.Thanks watch nfl live free
You there, this is really good post here. Thanks for taking the time to post such valuable information. Quality content is what always gets the visitors coming. Abercrombieandfitchsverige.se Google results
You’ve got some interesting points in this article. I would have never considered any of these if I didn’t come across this. Thanks!. go go anime
Nice to read your article! I am looking forward to sharing your adventures and experiences. know more